On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 07:37:30PM +0100, Magnus von Koeller wrote: > On Wednesday 21 November 2001 18:04, Michael H�ckel wrote: > > If it is really not possible to change that, wouldn't it then be > > better to leave the whole KDE release in unstable until all > > packages are ready for testing? > > Wouldn't making all KDE packages depend on kdelibs=2.2.1 and > kdebase=2.2.1 be enough? New packages would be held back then until > these other packages went through.
HELL NO! that would mean that if I make a minor fix (say a typo fix in the description or something that is Debian specific but with no code change) that every single app would need to be rebuilt and uploaded. > > Actually, right now the problem is that KMail hasn't gotten through > to testing yet but if the current KMail package depended on > kdelibs=2.1.2 and kdebase=2.1.2 then these upgrades would be held > back, too, right? How about this everyone... if you want something stable..use stable and don't use testing. I am not going to put in hacks to make things work for testing. That's just not the right way to go about things. Ivan -- ---------------- Ivan E. Moore II [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://snowcrash.tdyc.com GPG KeyID=90BCE0DD GPG Fingerprint=F2FC 69FD 0DA0 4FB8 225E 27B6 7645 8141 90BC E0DD
