Any advantages/disadvantages to doing it this way (with Konstruct) instead of using the CVS debs from http://opendoorsoftware.com/cgi/http.pl?p=kdecvs Just wondering which one would be easier to switch from when KDE leaves beta as far as maintaining settings and such? Brad
-----Original Message----- From: Antiphon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 4:02 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Thinking of trying out the KDE 3.2 CVS packages. No need to not give in! You can run both versions of KDE on a single machine by using the very accessible Konstruct application. You can even set it up to use a different .kde directory as well. To uninstall, all you have to do is delete the package directory and the source directory. http://developer.kde.org/build/konstruct/ On Monday 03 November 2003 03:15 pm, Doug Holland wrote: > On Sun 02 Nov 2003 7:07 pm, Antiphon wrote: > > Most things are relatively stable though Konqueror will crash > > occasionally, esp. on sites with Flash or Java so turn those off if you > > want stability. Even though things in general run faster, Orth's debs do > > not have the debugging options turned off so there will be some slowdown > > there. > > > > The new KMail is the biggest improvement IMO. Finally the threading "just > > works." and IMAP is improved. > > > > For some apps, you won't be able to go back to your old .kde settings so > > make sure and back it up if you ever want to go back. > > And now the KDE 3.2 beta is out. The bells and whistles doth tempt me. :D > > Doug -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
