Depends on how your config files are. If you use absolute paths, then you'll have some problems upgrading directly from your .kde-3.2b2 (or whatever) files. But you can always copy these files over to your .kde directory individually.
On Tuesday 04 November 2003 02:15 pm, Brad Cramer wrote: > Any advantages/disadvantages to doing it this way (with Konstruct) instead > of using the CVS debs from http://opendoorsoftware.com/cgi/http.pl?p=kdecvs > > Just wondering which one would be easier to switch from when KDE leaves > beta as far as maintaining settings and such? > Brad > > -----Original Message----- > From: Antiphon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 4:02 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Thinking of trying out the KDE 3.2 CVS packages. > > No need to not give in! You can run both versions of KDE on a single > machine > > by using the very accessible Konstruct application. You can even set it up > to > use a different .kde directory as well. To uninstall, all you have to do is > delete the package directory and the source directory. > > http://developer.kde.org/build/konstruct/ > > On Monday 03 November 2003 03:15 pm, Doug Holland wrote: > > On Sun 02 Nov 2003 7:07 pm, Antiphon wrote: > > > Most things are relatively stable though Konqueror will crash > > > occasionally, esp. on sites with Flash or Java so turn those off if you > > > want stability. Even though things in general run faster, Orth's debs > > > do not have the debugging options turned off so there will be some > > > slowdown there. > > > > > > The new KMail is the biggest improvement IMO. Finally the threading > > "just > > > > works." and IMAP is improved. > > > > > > For some apps, you won't be able to go back to your old .kde settings > > > so make sure and back it up if you ever want to go back. > > > > And now the KDE 3.2 beta is out. The bells and whistles doth tempt me. > > :D > > > > Doug
