On Friday 10 August 2012 20:02:52 Martin Albrecht wrote: > I am however not sure how exactly this thread relates except for talking > about the same object?
I follow the nepomuk ML and I remembered the code snippet that you posted was also on that ML, so yeah, that was indeed the trigger for my response, Other then that, the recent discussion on that ML pointed to some issues wrt to mail and akonadi, where akonadi seemed to be the culprit. > As far as I can tell the problem I am observing is > due to Kmail being still the 1.13.x series in Debian. Since your akonadi query always came back empty, which doesn't sound right, combined with the aforementioned issues, caused me to think that akonadi was more likely the issue then the version of KMail in Debian. I can very well be wrong, but thought it may be worth checking out if the cause of your issue was actually with akonadi. Cheers, Diederik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
