Am Montag, 2. Dezember 2013, 18:52:11 schrieb Sune Vuorela: > On 2013-12-02, José Manuel Santamaría Lema <[email protected]> wrote: > > So at this point I have two possible conclusions about that "diversity > > statement"[1] which generated some debate in the mailing lists, it's > > either: a) packaging qtwebkit doesn't count as a "contribution which > > interacts constructively with our community" > > or > > b) it's the greatest bullshit ever told about debian. > > The Debian Qt/KDE team has asked Jose Manuel Santamaria Lema to leave > the team because he is a poisonous person to work with. > > The Diversity Statement luckily isn't inclusive on this point. > > Please consider sending replies to my mailbox and not on the list.
So is RM: rekonq -- ROM; no security support and unmaintained http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=712808 the official answer to the question? What is the oppinion of the Debian Qt/KDE team on this? I ask cause otherwise there is no official answer to the question from Diederik. Are there plans to bring an up to date version of Rekonq to Debian? Thanks, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2600218.Zk8qWovH1C@merkaba
