Am Sonntag, 19. Januar 2014, 20:09:48 schrieb Rainer Dorsch: > On Sunday 19 January 2014 19:13:39 Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > Am Sonntag, 19. Januar 2014, 16:06:26 schrieb Rainer Dorsch: > > > On Tuesday 03 December 2013 22:30:56 Rainer Dorsch wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 03 December 2013 22:25:51 Rainer Dorsch wrote: > > > > > I build my own version of rekonq and 2.4.0 is the most stable > > > > > version > > > > > I > > > > > every had. I just copied to debian dir for building, i.e. I did not > > > > > really > > > > > put work into it. > > > > > > > > I forgot the link, if somebody wants to make us of it: > > > > http://bokomoko.de/~rd/rekonq_2.4.0-1_i386.deb > > > > > > > > (I know it is a very minor contribution, compared to what some of you > > > > do). > > > > > > I build the new upstream release: > > > > > > http://bokomoko.de/~rd/rekonq/rekonq_2.4.2-1_i386.deb > > > > > > Note, this does not address the unmaintained qtwebkit issue discussed > > > before. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Please share your source package as well. I want to build it for 64-Bit. > > > > Aside from that with copyleft licenses its always good to upload the > > sources as well. > > I just rebuilt with the debian dir from the last Debian rekonq package the > upstream sources. > > For completeness I uploaded everything to > > http://bokomoko.de/~rd/rekonq/2.4.2
Thanks. You can find a 64-bit build against current Debian Sid with KDE SC 4.11.5 at: http://martin-steigerwald.de/tmp/debian/rekonq-2.4.2/ rekonq starts and is able to show above URL and KDE homepage. Otherwise completely untested. Didn´t even adapt the changelog. Use at own risk. No complaints to Debian Qt/KDE team regarding this package. Ciao, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1434877.1N1ntaQfnL@merkaba
