On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 10:18:04PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > #include <hallo.h> > * Andres Salomon [Wed, Jan 05 2005, 12:15:51AM]: > > Alright, enough people are bothering me for 2.6.10 that we should probably > > get it into sid. I've committed a bunch of bk backports to the svn 2.6.10 > > k-s directory (small, obvious fixes for the most part); I'm going to aim > > for uploading 2.6.10 into NEW either Wed. or Thurs. unless anyone has > > objections. > > Wishlist on patches (laptop/power management related): > > http://people.ubuntu.com/~fabbione/misrouted-irq.dpatch (not enabled by > default, needs kernel options, solves the extremely nasty hard kernel > crash on resume from APM/ACPI suspend, thanks fabionne)
Probably makes sense, but I'd personally wait for some more testing or at least until it's in -mm. > The IRQ-after-swsusp-awakening patch (attached). Needed to make > some hardware drivers work after resuming from swsusp (Source: > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) > > The swsusp-speedup-patch (attached) - makes the swsusp in kernel a lot > faster on suspending (source: > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) We don't ship with swsusp enabled so this is just a waste of time.