On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 09:57:53AM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 18:33 +0900, Horms wrote: > > In the case of the ia64-ptrace fix, > > I am not sure if this code is needed by subsequent security fixes > > or not. > > I needed that to form a baseline to backport the fix for CAN-2005-0136. > The previous baseline had incompatible changes in ivt.S. I'm not sure > how trivial/validatable it would be to code a fix without this common > baseline. If that's something we want to do, I can look into it - but > I'd be more comfortable using this code since it has received testing > upstream.
As far as I am concerned, if a security fix depends on it, then it can be considered as part of that security fix, and thus is appropriate for inclusion in a security update. > > Watch this space. > > Many thanks for getting this going Horms! It seems that there might be a small symbol (ABI) problem in the 2.4.27 source packages I put on my site yesterday. I will look into this shortly. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
