On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 02:43:15PM +0900, Horms wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 07:21:06AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 10:40:12AM +0900, Horms wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 11:40:16PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 10:43:22AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > So, was there any decision whether to provide 2.6.8+security in > > > > > volatile, or just backport linux-2.6 (2.6.12)? I need to do a 2.6.12 > > > > > backport, so if people are wanting 2.6.12 for volatile, I'll do that; > > > > > however, if people want 2.6.8+security in volatile, I'll just put > > > > > 2.6.12 > > > > > in p.d.o/~dilinger, and make it known via apt-get.org. > > > > > > > > > > I've had reports of breakage with 2.6.12 and sarge which I believe are > > > > > related to udev, so we might need to keep that updated as well. There > > > > > is also some breakage with powerpc and older versions of > > > > > kernel-package; > > > > > we'd need to determine what's necessary for that (my tests on i386 w/ > > > > > 2.6.12-1 went just fine w/ the kernel-package that's in sarge). > > > > > > > > We need to backport kernel-package too, or i can submit a patch against > > > > the > > > > kernel-patch in sarge ? > > > > > > If we put 2.6.12 in volatile (sarge) then it should use the unified > > > packaging scheme, so we won't have to bother with per-arch > > > kernel-image/kernel-patch packages. > > > > Wrong, linux-2.6 needs at least version 9.005 of kernel-package. So either > > we > > backport it to sarge, or i provide a patch of the needed functionality for > > the > > version of kernel-package in sarge. > > Ok, now I understand what you are getting at. I think the sensible > path to getting 2.6.12 in volatile is to use the existing linux-2.6 > packaging, and this if kernel-package needs to be go into volatile, > thats fine by me. > > On a related note, Using newer kernel-package to build the sarge > kernels means a little bit of forward-porting work, but I think > that is acceptable. I've already made the changes for i386 and powerpc > and its in SVN.
Cool. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
