Sven Luther wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 11:57:51AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > * dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-16 17:04]: > > > I believe there's a rough consensus to not ship 2.4 in etch. Anyone > > > object to a filing of bugs to remove these packages from etch? > > > > For mips/mipsel, there's at least one sub-arch that is not in 2.6 yet. > > It's getting close though, but in the meantime I'd like to keep 2.4. > > > > For arm, I've recently removed the last bits of 2.4 from d-i and I was > > going to request the removal after the next d-i beta. > > > > > In general, imho 2.4 should be removed from d-i first for each arch, > > and then after the next beta the 2.4 kernel images can be removed. We > > can start with the removal of 2.4 from those architectures which no > > longer use 2.4 at all (e.g. powerpc). > > Notice that we are not asking removal from d-i, but from the archive > completely.
It will AFAICS break all remaining d-i with 2.4 because those try to install a 2.4 kernel from testing by default. Frans, Joey, what is your opinion about this? Thiemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
