On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 03:59:40PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-17 15:53]: > > > In general, imho 2.4 should be removed from d-i first for each arch, > > > and then after the next beta the 2.4 kernel images can be removed. We > > > can start with the removal of 2.4 from those architectures which no > > > longer use 2.4 at all (e.g. powerpc). > > > > Notice that we are not asking removal from d-i, but from the archive > > completely. > > I know, but that'll probably break d-i.
Probably yes, altough a two step removal (first from sid, then from etch), would maybe make this less severe. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
