On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:13:19AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 04 June 2007 23:42, maximilian attems wrote: > > > what where the args against it appart from pure inertia?
> Note that you'll probably lose me as someone who occasionally helps reply > to bugs as I doubt I'll want to be subscribed to two separate kernel > lists. I suspect this will be true for others as well. > It will also mean that I will lose some sense of what is happening wrt the > kernel. > Are there enough people who are planning to subscribe to the "bug" list > anyway or is it just going to further reduce the number of people that > see and deal with kernel BRs? Well, I would invert this; I would expect any members of the kernel team to subscribe to the bts for the kernel packages, and currently the easiest way to do that is by subscribing to debian-kernel, so moving the bug traffic to -maint seems like it's just an obstacle for the maintainers to get bug traffic they should (and want to) receive. If nothing else, I think moving the bug traffic to a separate list is going to give us a "split-brain" effect, since it's not uncommon for bugs to warrant group discussion, and the group it should be discussed with is this one, AFAIK. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
