On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 06:06:53PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sunday 04 May 2008 17:23, Waldi wrote: > > | Your rights to redistribute the Software shall be contingent upon your > > | installation of this Agreement in its entirety in the same directory as > > | the Software. > > This was interpreted by at least one person that the license needs to > > pushed in the same directory on the mirror than the package. > And because there is one person interpreting this differently than the > licencing party itself, Debian shall not do what the licencing party and the > users would like to see?
Who wants to define that someone is not allowed to define a binary dump as source and publish it under the GPL and we are therefor not allowed to distribute such things? > The question where this discussion is documented is still open. Somewhere in the IRC logs. Update: Just found it, was between aba and me, in #debian.de, 25.5.2006. > And the > question whether you as the maintainers agree with that one person or if you > going to change this... If the ftp-team acks it, I have no problem with that. Bastian -- Warp 7 -- It's a law we can live with. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
