Hi, On Sunday 04 May 2008 19:12, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > This was interpreted by at least one person that the license needs to > > > pushed in the same directory on the mirror than the package. > > And because there is one person interpreting this differently than the > > licencing party itself, Debian shall not do what the licencing party and > > the users would like to see? > Who wants to define that someone is not allowed to define a binary dump > as source and publish it under the GPL and we are therefor not allowed > to distribute such things?
Even after reading this three times and having my second coffee I fail to
understand what this paragraph has to do with the ipw2x00 firmware. It's not
GPLed.
Maybe I need a third coffee though.
> > The question where this discussion is documented is still open.
> Somewhere in the IRC logs.
> Update: Just found it, was between aba and me, in #debian.de, 25.5.2006.
So there is no public log. (And it was probably also in the wrong language :)
> > And the
> > question whether you as the maintainers agree with that one person or if
> > you going to change this...
> If the ftp-team acks it, I have no problem with that.
Cool.
So let's get their confirmation.
regards,
Holger
pgp7MZcj0ttlC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
