On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 09:44:04PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > Hi Dann > > You asked about the latest status and here it is. > Please tell which ones you want me to fix for the next lenny release of the > kernel. I'll prepare > a patch and regression test that version for you. > > #510787: > Refers to an other bug report that was not openvz specific. Should it be > forwarded to an non-openvz version of the kernel or kept here? > In any case I have added latest information to the report and told where > the problem has been forwarded. > > #511165: > Patch exist for 2.6.24 and 2.6.26. Fix is available in > http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.26-openvz;a=commit;h=b5e1f74cee5bc2c45bdca53a7218fb8de89215dd > Not sure if this is an ABI breaker. > > #500876: > Fix available in: > http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.26-openvz;a=commit;h=777e8164ebf8a03e43511983cdec472f8691a8af > Problem is about to be verified. Regression tested without problems seen. > > #503097: > Reported as http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=930 > Seems to be a duplicate of #500876 above. > > #505174: > This is a request to go up to the latest version that includes fixes for > all the ones in this mail that describe that there is a fix available. > Unfortunatly there are ABI breakers... > > #508773: > Patch available in http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1054 > Fix in > http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.24-openvz;a=commit;h=20bd90762d4df4a3c7c247b660c696bdd0a27709 > Do not look like an ABI breaker to me. > > #500145: > Forwarded to http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1143 > Marked as dupliate of http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1067 > Not solved yet. > > #501985: > From: maximilian attems > the upstream nfs fixes are abi breakers and thus can't be integrated > at this point they will be for the first point release were abi > breaking will be allowed again. > > #494445: > There are a number of problems in this area. Fixes are available. > However some of them are ABI breakers. > > #500645: > Fix available in http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1034 > http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.26-openvz;a=commit;h=6d18ba377cfa3e86ee830fe6a5fce52b8fd51039 > I can not see that this is an ABI breaker, so it should be possibly to > apply this one without problem. > > Best regards, > > // Ola
so this looks quite clear that we need an ABI++, i'm off to a conf this week, but can have a look next week if aboves fixes haven't landed until then. thanks -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
