On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 09:44:04PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > Hi Dann > > You asked about the latest status and here it is. > Please tell which ones you want me to fix for the next lenny release of the > kernel. I'll prepare > a patch and regression test that version for you.
Wow Ola, thanks - great detail. I'll look this over and get back to you. > #510787: > Refers to an other bug report that was not openvz specific. Should it be > forwarded to an non-openvz version of the kernel or kept here? > In any case I have added latest information to the report and told where > the problem has been forwarded. > > #511165: > Patch exist for 2.6.24 and 2.6.26. Fix is available in > http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.26-openvz;a=commit;h=b5e1f74cee5bc2c45bdca53a7218fb8de89215dd > Not sure if this is an ABI breaker. > > #500876: > Fix available in: > http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.26-openvz;a=commit;h=777e8164ebf8a03e43511983cdec472f8691a8af > Problem is about to be verified. Regression tested without problems seen. > > #503097: > Reported as http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=930 > Seems to be a duplicate of #500876 above. > > #505174: > This is a request to go up to the latest version that includes fixes for > all the ones in this mail that describe that there is a fix available. > Unfortunatly there are ABI breakers... > > #508773: > Patch available in http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1054 > Fix in > http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.24-openvz;a=commit;h=20bd90762d4df4a3c7c247b660c696bdd0a27709 > Do not look like an ABI breaker to me. > > #500145: > Forwarded to http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1143 > Marked as dupliate of http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1067 > Not solved yet. > > #501985: > From: maximilian attems > the upstream nfs fixes are abi breakers and thus can't be integrated > at this point they will be for the first point release were abi > breaking will be allowed again. > > #494445: > There are a number of problems in this area. Fixes are available. > However some of them are ABI breakers. > > #500645: > Fix available in http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1034 > http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6.26-openvz;a=commit;h=6d18ba377cfa3e86ee830fe6a5fce52b8fd51039 > I can not see that this is an ABI breaker, so it should be possibly to > apply this one without problem. > > Best regards, > > // Ola > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 04:47:35PM -0700, dann frazier wrote: > > hey, > > The first lenny update is scheduled for early April, so I wanted to > > start coordinating the kernel update. > > > > Security > > -------- > > The lenny-security branch is currently caught up on security issues, > > so I'd like to release a DSA later this week. I'd appreciate it if the > > individual arch maintainers could test builds from this branch ahead > > of time. The CVE-2009-0029 touch a lot of arch-specific code and > > though they applied pretty easily to the lenny kernel, it'd still be > > good to get some testing there. I noticed that the snapshot archive > > now has a lenny-security dist for some archs (thanks waldi) > > > > Stable > > ------ > > There are several fixes queued up for a stable upload. I have a > > few more small fixes from jmm to review/commit as well, and it looks > > like tbm has an RTC regression fix pending. I've seen mentions of > > OpenVZ fixes from Ola/maks - what is the status of those? Are there > > any other changes people are working on? > > > > ABI changes > > ----------- > > The security fixes don't currently break the ABI. It sounds like the > > openvz fixes are ABI-breaking?. If it is going to be ready for this > > update and does break the ABI, I'd also like to get the hppa > > large-module fix in. And, of course, we'll need to notify the d-i team > > of this change. > > > -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
