On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:06:03AM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 04:43:31PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > > If this is the case, and if we assume that pv-ops xen support is > > > eventually included upstream (which certainly appears to be the goal), > > > why the deprecation notice? > > > > who stepped to properly maintain the patch in the current > > for the next stable release and more important during it's hole > > lifetime!? > > AIUI, the pv-ops xen support is under active development and will be > included in the mainline kernel. There will be no separate patch to > maintain. DomU support is already mainline. See > http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenParavirtOps for details.
you still didn't read or get my question: Who will maintain the chosen pvops patch for the Squeeze lifetime? yes, this is the part of the work: * backward port important fixes, securtiy patches * read bug reports, decipher oopses and be able to fix them -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
