On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 07:56:20PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 08:13:27PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > pv_ops dom0 patches will require more maintenance than the forward-ports > > though.. since it's not yet feature-complete, and will have many > > patches and fixes still.. > > You just won a free maintainership of the forward port in Lenny. The > pv-ops tree only failed to build for me, not crashed during runtime for > me. >
:) Yep, I know, the forward-port in lenny is buggy on some setups (for example requiring pci=nomsi to boot). Also live migrations seem to be broken with it. The .31 forward-port seems more stable, based on the user comments so far. Then again it's based on the SLES11 forward-port, so Novell has worked pretty hard on it.. (lenny .26 forward-port was some early version). I've been testing pv_ops dom0 tree myself ever since it was introduced, and I've been hunting many bugs from it.. I'm currently helping to debug the drm/ttm stuff, which isn't working. -- Pasi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
