On 05/29/2014 08:27 AM, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
On 05/28/2014 10:09 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I think this does need more explanation.

Ok, sure. I'll follow up.

Just documenting this one.

I reached out some key folks here, and there was no strong opinion/
objection about going with 250 HZ.

Of course, anyone who /needs/ a 100 HZ kernel can just change it
and build.


This excerpt is mentioned in [1]:

>    Remove override to HZ=100 (from HZ=250 in main config)
>            There were no strong opinions against HZ=250, internally.


Thanks!

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2014/06/msg00060.html

--
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]

Reply via email to