On 05/29/2014 08:27 AM, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
On 05/28/2014 10:09 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I think this does need more explanation.
Ok, sure. I'll follow up.
Just documenting this one.
I reached out some key folks here, and there was no strong opinion/
objection about going with 250 HZ.
Of course, anyone who /needs/ a 100 HZ kernel can just change it
and build.
This excerpt is mentioned in [1]:
> Remove override to HZ=100 (from HZ=250 in main config)
> There were no strong opinions against HZ=250, internally.
Thanks!
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2014/06/msg00060.html
--
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
IBM Linux Technology Center
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]