Just to avoid confusion:
>>>>> "H" == Heather <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: H> d) unison. http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison/ H> noted, there's an unstable debian package :) and Uwe H> noted that the provided binary worked perfectly on H> his potato. What I meant and wrote was that the unison-provided binary (in version 2.6.11) works perfectly on my Debian potato (and also on my desktop-redhat at work), and BTW also the Solaris binary (of course, also in version 2.6.11) works perfectly under a machine that I partially sync to/from. I have not tested the Debian-binary from unstable. >>>>> "UN" == Uwe Nestmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: UN> Of the latter, there is an unstable Debian package, but UN> the binary version for linux provided by the UN> unison-developers (for unison-2.6.11) also works UN> flawlessly on my potato. == Uwe ==
