>>>>> On 10 Jul 2000 13:06:40 +0200, Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Henning> Scripsit James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> The main sentence of this section is "Recipient shall be solely
>> responsible for damages arising, directly or indirectly, out of
>> its utilization of rights under this License." The sentence you
>> are harping on is a clarification of this sentence.
Henning> Well, that's a possible reasoning, but how can you be sure
Henning> that the second sentence is not just another, independently
Henning> valid, rule?
I can't of course, but I expect it'd be written as two items if it
were intended to be.
Jim
--
@James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Blessed Be!
@ http://jimdres.home.mindspring.com | Linux is kewl!
@"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
