debian-legal  

Messages by Thread

• About distribution of modified copy of Debian OS Borja Sanchez
  • Re: About distribution of modified copy of Debian OS Daniel Hakimi
  • Re: About distribution of modified copy of Debian OS Borja Sanchez
  • Re: About distribution of modified copy of Debian OS Andrew M.A. Cater
• Re: Brief update about software freedom and artificial intelligence Daniel Lange
  • Re: Brief update about software freedom and artificial intelligence Russ Allbery
• Is GeneralUser soundfont's license suitable for Debian main? undef
  • Re: Is GeneralUser soundfont's license suitable for Debian main? Paul Wise
  • Re: Is GeneralUser soundfont's license suitable for Debian main? undef
  • Re: Is GeneralUser soundfont's license suitable for Debian main? Paul Wise
• Bug#1003044: internal 'getzoneinfofile_stream' method emits a warning message James Addison
• v2ray geoip data has problemic license linsui
• Pracownik na produkcję Adam Moskalik
• Fw: Re: [Emc-developers] Bug#1030304: Licensing & copyright issues Adam Ant
• Re: Bug#1029842: ITP: randombytes -- Library generating fresh randomness Sam Hartman
  • Re: Bug#1029842: ITP: randombytes -- Library generating fresh randomness Jan Mojzis
  • Re: Bug#1029842: ITP: randombytes -- Library generating fresh randomness Sam Hartman
• Re: Bug#1029055: Debian Expat and SPDX MIT License Text Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Bug#1029055: Debian Expat and SPDX MIT License Text Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Bug#1029055: Debian Expat and SPDX MIT License Text Axel Beckert
  • Re: Bug#1029055: Debian Expat and SPDX MIT License Text Richard Fontana
  • Re: Bug#1029055: Debian Expat and SPDX MIT License Text Soren Stoutner
• License question about sf2 soundfont in Tuxguitar Helmar Gerloni
  • Re: License question about sf2 soundfont in Tuxguitar Roberto
  • Re: License question about sf2 soundfont in Tuxguitar Helmar Gerloni
  • Re: Bug#819332: License question about sf2 soundfont in Tuxguitar tony mancill
  • Re: Bug#819332: License question about sf2 soundfont in Tuxguitar tony mancill
• RFC about DFSG-freeness of PHP license [Re: Bug#903999: ITP: php-doc -- Documentation for PHP] Nicholas D Steeves
  • Re: RFC about DFSG-freeness of PHP license [Re: Bug#903999: ITP: php-doc -- Documentation for PHP] Athos Ribeiro
• Questions about spacet cadet reverse engineering matthias . geiger1024
  • Re: Questions about spacet cadet reverse engineering Stephan Verbücheln
  • Re: Questions about spacet cadet reverse engineering Roberto A. Foglietta
• About debian/patches/* licenses 野崎耕平
  • Re: About debian/patches/* licenses Paul Wise
  • Re: About debian/patches/* licenses 野崎耕平
• linuxcnc licensing issues Adam Ant
  • Re: linuxcnc licensing issues Andrew M.A. Cater
  • Re: linuxcnc licensing issues Mihai Moldovan
  • Re: linuxcnc licensing issues Adam Ant
• Store Wikimedia Commons picture of the day and description Patrice Coni
  • Re: Store Wikimedia Commons picture of the day and description Gunnar Wolf
  • Re: Store Wikimedia Commons picture of the day and description Martin Steigerwald
  • Re: Store Wikimedia Commons picture of the day and description Stephan Verbücheln
• The 'Source' field in DEP 5 Akbarkhon Variskhanov
  • Re: The 'Source' field in DEP 5 Francesco Poli
• Fwd: License question virtualbox-ext-pack vs. virtualbox-guest-additions-iso Christian Kuka
• Black Week- bis zu 50 % Rabatt für Ihre erste Bestellung enwy
• Technical requirements for upstream license specification Marcin Owsiany
  • Re: Technical requirements for upstream license specification Michael Lustfield
  • Re: Technical requirements for upstream license specification Marcin Owsiany
• Microsoft Bing or Windows Spotlight daily picture as wallpaper? Patrice Coni
  • Re: Microsoft Bing or Windows Spotlight daily picture as wallpaper? Daniel Hakimi
  • Re: Microsoft Bing or Windows Spotlight daily picture as wallpaper? Eloi
• GeForce nvidia driver license for commerical use? Roberto A. Foglietta
  • Re: GeForce nvidia driver license for commerical use? Simon McVittie
  • Re: GeForce nvidia driver license for commerical use? Roberto A. Foglietta
  • Re: GeForce nvidia driver license for commerical use? Simon McVittie
  • Re: GeForce nvidia driver license for commerical use? Roberto A. Foglietta
• Which parts do we need to open source if we use Debian on our robotics products pzk
  • Re: Which parts do we need to open source if we use Debian on our robotics products Yadd
  • Re: Which parts do we need to open source if we use Debian on our robotics products Paul Wise
• FreeBSD legacy license with restrictions on copyright notice placement Richard Fontana
  • Re: FreeBSD legacy license with restrictions on copyright notice placement Sam Hartman
  • Re: FreeBSD legacy license with restrictions on copyright notice placement Richard Fontana
• Nmap Public Source License Version 0.94 - Is it DFSG-compliant? Samuel Henrique
  • Re: Nmap Public Source License Version 0.94 - Is it DFSG-compliant? Walter Landry
  • Re: Nmap Public Source License Version 0.94 - Is it DFSG-compliant? Francesco Poli
  • Re: Nmap Public Source License Version 0.94 - Is it DFSG-compliant? Sam Hartman
  • Re: Nmap Public Source License Version 0.94 - Is it DFSG-compliant? Francesco Poli
  • Re: Nmap Public Source License Version 0.94 - Is it DFSG-compliant? Sam Hartman
  • Re: Nmap Public Source License Version 0.94 - Is it DFSG-compliant? Francesco Poli
  • Re: Nmap Public Source License Version 0.94 - Is it DFSG-compliant? Florian Weimer
  • Re: Nmap Public Source License Version 0.94 - Is it DFSG-compliant? Hilko Bengen
  • Re: Nmap Public Source License Version 0.94 - Is it DFSG-compliant? Samuel Henrique
  • Re: Nmap Public Source License Version 0.94 - Is it DFSG-compliant? Samuel Henrique
  • Re: Nmap Public Source License Version 0.94 - Is it DFSG-compliant? Hilko Bengen
  • Re: Nmap Public Source License Version 0.94 - Is it DFSG-compliant? Francesco Poli
• Microsoft Public License DFSG compatibility Ben Westover
  • Re: Microsoft Public License DFSG compatibility Sam Hartman
  • Re: Microsoft Public License DFSG compatibility Sebastian Crane
  • Re: Microsoft Public License DFSG compatibility Francesco Poli
• Google verification code Google
  • Google Verification Code Google
  • Google Verification Code Google
• I need help Brandy Mckinney
• Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Ben Westover
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Mihai Moldovan
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Ben Westover
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Paul Wise
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Ben Westover
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Walter Landry
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Ben Westover
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Walter Landry
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Mihai Moldovan
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Steve McIntyre
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Stephan Verbücheln
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Steve McIntyre
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Francesco Poli
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Paul Wise
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Ben Westover
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Paul Wise
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Stephan Verbücheln
  • Re: Is the APSL 2.0 DFSG-compliant? Stephan Verbücheln
• Need license clarification Dima Kogan
  • Re: Need license clarification Paul Wise
  • Re: Need license clarification Dima Kogan
• Expat-like license - DFSG-ok? julien . puydt
  • Re: Expat-like license - DFSG-ok? Yadd
  • Re: Expat-like license - DFSG-ok? Paul Wise
• Advice about a package fork (displaycal) Christian Marillat
  • Re: Advice about a package fork (displaycal) Francesco Poli
• Data is showing victoryschool00057
• Binary file inside fruit package Marcos Talau
  • Re: Binary file inside fruit package Walter Landry
  • Re: Binary file inside fruit package Marcos Talau
  • Re: Binary file inside fruit package Sebastian Crane
  • Re: Binary file inside fruit package Stephan Verbücheln
  • Re: Binary file inside fruit package Tobias Frost
  • Re: Binary file inside fruit package Sebastian Crane
  • Re: Binary file inside fruit package Sam Hartman
  • Re: Binary file inside fruit package Paul Wise
  • Re: Binary file inside fruit package Simon McVittie
  • Re: Binary file inside fruit package Stephan Verbücheln
• Using Debian as the base for a commercial product Дмитрий Разваров
  • Re: Using Debian as the base for a commercial product J.B. Nicholson
• a quick review of the timescaledb license Antoine Beaupré
  • Re: a quick review of the timescaledb license Antoine Beaupré
  • Re: a quick review of the timescaledb license Sebastian Crane
  • Re: a quick review of the timescaledb license Francesco Poli
• OpenLDAP d/copyright overhaul Sergio Durigan Junior
• Re: Re: Gibraltar Orange Lofton
• Re: Re: Urgent: Mirroring of encryption software in the USA Orange Lofton
• Unsere lösung für die kommenden tage 4u2move - Zusammenklappbares E-Bike
• MIT + explicit "Don't sell this code." - DFSG compliant? Fab Stz
  • Re: MIT + explicit "Don't sell this code." - DFSG compliant? David Given
  • Re: MIT + explicit "Don't sell this code." - DFSG compliant? Fab Stz
  • Re: MIT + explicit "Don't sell this code." - DFSG compliant? David Given
  • Re: MIT + explicit "Don't sell this code." - DFSG compliant? Paul Wise
• Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue (Was: Lottery NEW queue (Re: Are libraries with bumped SONAME subject of inspection of ftpmaster or not)) Andreas Tille
  • Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue (Was: Lottery NEW queue (Re: Are libraries with bumped SONAME subject of inspection of ftpmaster or not)) Philip Hands
  • Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue (Was: Lottery NEW queue (Re: Are libraries with bumped SONAME subject of inspection of ftpmaster or not)) Francesco Poli
  • Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue Russ Allbery
  • Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue Stephan Lachnit
  • Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue Pirate Praveen
  • Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue Maxime Chambonnet
  • Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue Russ Allbery
  • Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue Jonathan Carter
  • Legal advice regarding the NEW queue Stephan Lachnit
  • Re: Legal advice regarding the NEW queue Jonathan Carter
  • Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue Jonathan Carter
• Bug#1004341: mercurial-common: please add contrib/zsh_completion to d/copyright Daniel Shahaf
• GihHub style logo license Yadd
  • Re: GihHub style logo license Jérémy Lal
  • Re: GihHub style logo license Yadd
• Question about Debian redistribution Navtej Bhatti
  • Re: Question about Debian redistribution Walter Landry
  • Re: Question about Debian redistribution Paul Wise
  • Re: Question about Debian redistribution Mihai Moldovan
  • Re: Question about Debian redistribution Navtej Bhatti
  • Re: Question about Debian redistribution Paul Wise
• Is 'The Unlicense' DFSG-compliant? Jan Gru
  • Re: Is 'The Unlicense' DFSG-compliant? Andrew M.A. Cater
  • Re: Re: Is 'The Unlicense' DFSG-compliant? Jan Gru
  • Re: Re: Is 'The Unlicense' DFSG-compliant? Andrew M.A. Cater
• Re: Bug#1001894: ITP: spacecadetpinball -- Decompilation and port of "3D Pinball for Windows - Space Cadet" lucylikesyourface
• Remittance Advice - Debian-legal Account Payable
• We are the factory of cue product from China #gqS7PpVr # caleb
• Fwd: RNNoise's model and DFSG Nicholas Guriev
  • Re: Fwd: RNNoise's model and DFSG Walter Landry
  • Re: Fwd: RNNoise's model and DFSG Nicholas Guriev
  • Re: Fwd: RNNoise's model and DFSG Paul Wise
• Export Compliance/Customs Information about Debian Software . Cubik65536
  • Re: Export Compliance/Customs Information about Debian Software Walter Landry
• Re: Thoughts on GPL's Appropriate Legal Notices? or the CPAL? Benito Garcia
  • Re: Thoughts on GPL's Appropriate Legal Notices? or the CPAL? Daniel Hakimi
• MLCC & IC &Transistors & Diodes from CN Tina Tang
• Advice on licenses with "funny" amendments Dominik George
  • Re: Advice on licenses with "funny" amendments Francesco Poli
  • Re: Advice on licenses with "funny" amendments Paul Wise
  • Re: Advice on licenses with "funny" amendments Walter Landry
  • Re: Advice on licenses with "funny" amendments Daniel Leidert
  • Re: Advice on licenses with "funny" amendments John Scott
• Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums Chuck Zmudzinski
  • Re: Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums Jonathan Carter
  • Re: Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums Chuck Zmudzinski
  • Re: Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums Chuck Zmudzinski
  • Re: Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums Peter Ehlert
  • Re: Privacy and defamation of character on Debian public forums Tom Dial
• Advice needed for licensing in modus-themes Dhavan V
  • Re: Advice needed for licensing in modus-themes Protesilaos Stavrou
  • Re: Advice needed for licensing in modus-themes Paul Wise
  • Re: Advice needed for licensing in modus-themes Dhavan V
• I need help my acct was hacked Scarlett Kelley
  • Re: I need help my acct was hacked Andrew M.A. Cater
• List of journal Bastien ROUCARIES
  • Re: List of journal Walter Landry
• Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Andreas Tille
  • Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Tobias Frost
  • Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Felix Lechner
  • Re: Bug#915541: Removal of upstream "--will-cite" functionality has been reverted Andreas Tille

• Earlier messages