On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 11:35:07AM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 11:21:24AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > IRAF has a kind of custom government license which was previously > > decided [0] to be free. IRAF wants to link with NCAR which is (now) > > available under the GPL. Is that allowed, even though IRAF is not > > GPL? IRAF is not a "derivitive" of NCAR, although the resulting > > executable binaries would be, I guess. GPL seems to say so: > > You can always link GPL material with non-GPL material, so long as that > other work is GPL-compatible. What defines GPL compatibility? Modify and distribute? Justin
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
