Scripsit "Michael K. Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 07:46:18 -0500, Nathanael Nerode
>> I guess I'm convinced. :-)
> That the GPL is legally an offer of contract? If so, it's good to
> know that the substance of my argument is persuasive to at least one
> person besides myself. :-)
I got lost somewhere along the way: Why is it important to you whether
the GPL is a "contract" or not?
You don't have to convince me - in my home jurisdiction it is beyond
dispute that application of the GPL would be a matter for our contract
law, and I won't aspire to claim anything about how it works in a
common-law system.
But the heat of the debate nevertheless leaves me wondering what it's
for. Does it make any difference, and if so, what?
--
Henning Makholm "Larry wants to replicate all the time ... ah, no,
all I meant was that he likes to have a bang everywhere."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
