On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 03:38:40AM -0800, Michael K. Edwards wrote: > The exec() boundary is bogus. The interpreter waffle is bogus. The > LGPL exemption is bogus. The syscall exemption is bogus. The > Classpath exception is bogus. The entire claim that linking creates a > derivative work is bogus. A published functional interface is a > published functional interface.
I think you're overgeneralizing. The mechanical issues are informative but not definative. The license issues are applicable to specific circumstances (though I agree that they're not relevant to the bogus subject line of this thread). -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
