> > The license on Eclipse doesn't make an issue of this. > > > > The license on Kaffe explicitly says that running Kaffe is not restricted. > > > > So you have no plausible reason for believing that this matters.
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 09:55:10PM -0500, Walter Landry wrote: > Ok. One more time. The license on Kaffe says that distributing Kaffe > with other things can be restricted. That's not a plausible reason for believing that your "Eclipse can't go in main because of the GPL" has any validity to it. > > Irrelevant, until you show some reason for this to matter in > > the specific case of Eclipse and Kaffe. > > You gave alternate heuristics. I gave reasons why they won't work. > Please pay attention. Your "reasons" are nothing more than sentence fragments, taken out of context. > > But I should note that I'm not claiming that any of these criteria should > > stand by themselves. > > Perhaps you should take some time and consider these things a little > more. Otherwise, you are just wasting everyone's time. If I had any respect for your interpetation of the issue we're currently discussing, I might take you up on this suggestion. -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
