Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Glenn Maynard wrote: >> The GPL very deliberately does not specify >> the preferred form for modification, and authors shouldn't do so (at >> least not in a legally-binding way or an attempt to "interpret" the GPL). > Right. I think there is no harm in saying "My preferred form for > modification > is the texinfo source", as long as it is *not* a legally-binding change. We > have suggested such things to make things clearer for people who are > uncomfortable and fearful about the use of the phrase "source code" for > documentation, so as indicate that it is a meaningful phrase. We do not want > such statements to act as a restriction.
Yes, it was in this sense that I suggested this addition. Regards, Frank -- Frank K�ster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z�rich Debian Developer
