On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Branden Robinson wrote: > As should be well-known, Stephen King is a money machine. I find it > hard to believe he'd have published under a pen name if to do so > would have meant exposing himself to claims of fraudulent copyright.
Definetly. Just to clarify, in case it was still unclear, my primary concern isn't with the rights of the copyright holder being preserved (they are preserved regardless) but with the ability of people to make derived works from such a work, and whether or not anonymous copyright holders with (questionable?) licensing agreements curtails the distribution of derivative works. Don Armstrong -- This message brought to you by weapons of mass destruction related program activities, and the letter G. http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
