On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 15:59:16 -0800 Don Armstrong wrote: > That being said, you're still looking at this from the wrong > angle. We're here[1] to preserve our freedom to modify and distribute > modified software, not to sacrifice useful freedoms to include > anything in Debian.
Exactly! :)
The clear separation between Free-and-self-contained (i.e. main) and
other (outside of main) software is one of the best features of Debian.
It should be preserved as much as possible.
>
> While we should tie everything we can back to specific clauses and
> interpretations of the DFSG, there's no reason to allow software that
> is clearly non-free into Debian simply because it artfully avoids the
> letter of the DFSG.
Yes, I definitely agree.
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
......................................................................
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgphVaj0m3TQR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
