On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 01:53:04PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > You are missing the obvious point that the debian-legal consensus is not > the definition of freedom for Debian. So yes, I think that this > consensus has a limited value.
(This doesn't really need any further reply, since this type of claim has been made and responded to numerous times already.) What I said stands: > People like Marco keep saying "the DFSG doesn't say it explicitly, > therefore it should be allowed", which is irresponsible, favoring > getting their warez in main (despite the latest ugly restrictions) You treat the DFSG as a set of pesky rules to be weaseled around and dictionary-lawyered, instead of a set of guidelines to be followed. -- Glenn Maynard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
