On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 04:17:14PM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote: > The origionally posted license seemed to imply that clauses 3 and 4 were > alternatives, and you only had to meet one of them; clause 3 appeared to > more or less be a BSD advertising clause (cross-reference the 'flowc' > licensing discussion...) > > If it's free, then wouldn't that make the license free (by not exercising > option 4 at all, making it irrelevant)? I agree that trying to invoke > option 4 wouldn't work.
You have to satisfy both #3 and #4: you have to do 3 *as well as* one of 4a, 4b or 4c. Maybe you read #4 as part of "Alternatively ...". The "alternatively" is part of #3, and unrelated to #4. -- Glenn Maynard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
