Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] However, conventionally, "may not do foo" is supposed > to be parsed as (a) whereas "must not do foo" is usually parsed > analogously to (b) - which makes them actually mean the same in > natural English.
Which convention specified that change in meaning for "may"? [...] > But it is not our modus operandi to consider something to be *free* > based on such a reading that clearly diverges from what the author > actually did mean. Would you please forward the explanation you appear to have received from the PHP licence author? -- MJR/slef http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
