O Martes, 22 de Febreiro de 2005 �s 13:54:18 +0100, Eike Dehling escrib�a: > So unless someone uses it commercially no license applies. Debian itself
A license is a permission grant. No license == no permission. > isn't commercial, so it doesn't apply here. The first sentence even > encourages redistribution/modification, i'd think? How much of a problem > is the restriction on commercial use, when non-commercial use is free? Many of Debian's users are commercial entities. That's why the DFSG forbid discriminating between fields of endeavo(u)r (meaning, a license that says, for instance, "noncommercial use only" or "not for atomic weapons testing" or "use in the trade of oil or oil-based products requires payment of a 0.5% royalty" isn't valid for Debian). -- Jacobo Tarr�o | http://jacobo.tarrio.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
