Daniel Carrera wrote:
Alright guys,
Here's the lates (and hopefully final) draft of the copyright section:
This document is Copyright 2004 its contributors as defined in
the section titled AUTHORS. This document is released under the
terms of the GNU General Public License, version 2 or later
(http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html), or under the terms of
the Creative Commons Attribution License, version 2.0 or later
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), at the option of
any part receiving it.
How does that look?
Cheers,
I - personally - loathe the "or later" stuff. When you license some work
under a some version "or later", you are trusting eg in your case both
the FSF/GNU and the CC not to botch the next versions. I wouldn't. IMHO,
it's very ample. Stay with the versions which implications you fully
comprehend (GPL v2.0, CC-BY v2.0) would be my advise.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
