Hi debian-legal, I have ITP'ed xymtex ( http://bugs.debian.org/304714 ). This collection of LaTeX macros has the following license:
%% Copying of this file is authorized only if either %% %% (1) you make absolutely no changes to your copy, including name and %% directory name %% (2) if you do make changes, %% (a) you name it something other than the names included in the %% ``chemist'' directory and %% (b) you acknowledge the original name. %% This restriction ensures that all standard styles are identical. %% %% ======================================= %% %% This file is a modification of latex.tex (LaTeX2.09) and of latex.ltx %% (a LaTeX2e), the reused parts of which is subject to %% Copyright 1994 the LaTeX3 project and the individual authors (For further %% copyright information see the file legal.txt of the LaTeX2e standard %% distribution, and any other copyright indicated in this file.) [end license] Assuming that by "copying", upstream really means "public redistribution" (something which I have already emailed him to clarify), is this acceptable for main? Can "Public redistribution is authorized if..." be considered a grant of permission? If so, my understanding is that the restrictions in option (2) are permissible under the DFSG's "Integrity of the author's source code", correct? Thanks, -- Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Physics Department WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/ Princeton University GPG public key ID: 4F83C751 Princeton, NJ 08544 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
