> > Sounds right. On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 03:15:48AM -0700, Michael K. Edwards wrote: > Nope. Compilations (US) / collections (Berne) and derivative works > are disjoint sets under the Berne Convention (Article 2.5 and 2.3 > respectively) and its national implementations (separate definitions > in 17 USC 101).
What makes you think that the mathematical concept of a disjoint set has any relevance here? Would you claim that article 2(6) is disjoint from article 2(5)? Or would you claim instead that it's just focussing on a different aspect of the same issue? > Incidentally, the GPL doesn't use "compilation" or "collection" in the > legal sense at all. Yeah, well, as it happens we were comparing Italian and U.S. copyright law. -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
