Michael K. Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For the record, so long as implementations of software freedom are > copyright-based, documents from which fragments cannot legally be cut > and pasted into the software they accompany do not belong in main. > This applies most emphatically to the GFDL and to RFCs, inconvenient > as that may be.
When did license incompatibility become a freeness issue? -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]