Michael K. Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> For the record, so long as implementations of software freedom are
> copyright-based, documents from which fragments cannot legally be cut
> and pasted into the software they accompany do not belong in main. 
> This applies most emphatically to the GFDL and to RFCs, inconvenient
> as that may be.

When did license incompatibility become a freeness issue?

-- 
Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to