Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 01.05.05 20:57:14: > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:56:21PM +0100, Lewis Jardine wrote: > > If I'm right about this, a document licensed as 'The GFDL and/or GPL v2, > > at your option' by the copyright holder could be distributed by a third > > party under the GFDL, the GPL, or 'The GFDL and/or GPL v2, at your > > option'. > > Sure. Wikipedia is not such a document, being licensed under the GFDL > only. So that's not particularly relevant.
Now, I am confused. If I understand the above right, then it is permitted to take a text of wikipedia and redistribute it under the GPL? But the first answer to my post was negative ? May I call a plea here: Can someone explain me, please, in easy words the whole thing of this incompatibility of GFDL and GPL and if it is permitted or not or something? !!! I don't want to break any license !!! And I don't want to publish my work and then someone comes and tells me that I am working on an illegal base(rm -rf *). (Maybe someone can explain it to me in German.) Thank you very much! Regards Gueven Bay ______________________________________________________________ Verschicken Sie romantische, coole und witzige Bilder per SMS! Jetzt bei WEB.DE FreeMail: http://f.web.de/?mc=021193 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
