On 5/11/05, Humberto Massa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Raul Miller wrote: > >Once again: if Section 0 does not apply, then the GPL does not apply, > >and therefore the GPL can't grant you license to copy that work. > > Ok... are you arguing that you *still* have to comply to the license of > the non-GPLd parts? If so, yes, you are right. But where (in practice) > does this takes us eg, IRT libsnmp (which was the start of the discussion)?
If the GPL does not apply, all parts are non-GPLed parts. The question with libsnmp is whether the routing daemon uses the SSL functionality. If not, there should be no problem -- it's mere aggregation, and we're just being sloppy about our packaging. If the routing daemon does use the SSL code then we've got a licensing problem. -- Raul
