On 5/11/05, Michael K. Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/11/05, Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The GPL does not grant the right to sublicense. > > Section 6's grant does not depend on an agent having a valid > > license. > > Horse, pulp, etc. I'll even point you at a message where I made the > case that sublicense isn't workable: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/01/msg00746.html . Ask a > court.
That post does not address this issue. > > Here, you're assuming that the section 6 GPL license grants > > are not license grants but something else. > > What happens to an offer of contract when the offeror is dead? If there is an offer of contract, it's an offer of contract with the estate original offeror's estate. > How about you dig for relevant case law for a change? That's a rather vague request. -- Raul
