Raul Miller wrote:
On 5/12/05, Humberto Massa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I will do my "repeated assertion" act: It's a dynamically linked
executable, for the love of $DEITY!
Which makes it a collective work. Collective works can be eligible
for copyright protection, even if the only creative effort that went
into them is the selection and arrangement of their contents.
DY-NA-MI-CA-LLY. It does not contain any part of any other work. How can
it be a collective work?
You can argue that hello_world is insufficiently creative to
be eligible for copyright protection, but that argument can't
hold in the general case.
No, I was considering hello_world sufficiently creative for the sake of
argument.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
