On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 15:25 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > [NB: Please follow Debian list policy and do not Cc: people unless > they explicitly request a Cc. The canonical method of requesting a Cc: > is to set a Mail-Followup-To: header that includes your addres. Also, > you'll have much better luck if you refrain from top posting.]
I'm very sorry, the top posting was not intentional. I will also try not to Cc: to people who don't want an extra copy. > On Fri, 13 May 2005, Svante Signell wrote: > > I just wanted to know if dual licensing is possible. > > It is possible, but when we talk about dual licensing we typically > mean that two licenses are applied to a work, and the user can (at the > user's option) pick a specific license to use the work under. OK, so this is the case e.g. with mozilla and openoffice? > What you seemed to be asking for was two licenses for different > (disjoint) sets of users, which isn't going to be DFSG Free unless > both licenses are DFSG Free. [And possibly not even then... we'd have > to look at it very closely.] Is it possible to release the code as GPL and if necessary relicense at a later stage? Do all contributors to the improved version have to agree on this change of licence. What about copyright issues for contributed code? > > Don Armstrong > -- Svante Signell -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
