* Andrew Suffield :: > On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 12:17:42PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 10:06:48PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 04:20:05PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote: > > > You've got a problem with this one, because licenses can be > > > combined conjunctively and disjunctively. So a package might > > > be both entirely under foo and entirely under bar (foo || > > > bar), or it might be partially under foo and partially under > > > bar (foo && bar). > > > > If that is the only problem, a package can be tagged with more > > than one tag even from the same facet, which would be good > > enough to categorise your two examples. > > Imagine a package that can be distributed if you meet the terms > of: > > - the GPL > - both the MIT license and the 4-clause BSD license, > simultaneously > - both the MIT license and the Artistic license, simultaneously > > How would you tag this, so as to capture all this information?
( GPL ) || ( MIT && 4BSD ) || ( MIT && Artistic ) ?? :-) this is the easy one, what if some files are provided under each of those licenses? GPL + (MIT && 4BSD) + (MIT && Artistic)? Mozilla would be (GPL || MPL) + (GPL || ...) + ... ?? -- HTH, Massa -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
