[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Why not "You must offer the source (at no extra charge) to anyone > > who receives a binary from you"? That way the source will be readily > > available for any version that gets any significant distribution.
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The villain may chose not to offer subsequent versions to the leaking > party. Once that has happened a couple of times users will know how > they'd better behave... I find it hard to imagine someone with the creative talent to sustain this kind of release pattern, and the contradictory goals to want to release some kind of proprietary/free software. Sure, I guess it could happen, but the easiest solution is just for someone else to write better code. The high quality of free [libre] software depends directly on wide distribution. Constrained distribution isn't likely to be as good. -- Raul
