Anthony Towns writes: > If it were GPLed, you'd be able to distribute executables, based on > modified source, accompanying it with only an offer for the source, > without changing the names of any of the executables, and without having > to contact the author. But you can't, so it isn't. Or that's how it looks > to me.
That's a good point. Perhaps they could use a modified Artistic, replacing "b) It's accompanied by source" with GPL compatible language? -- John Hasler This posting is in the public domain. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do with it what you will. Dancing Horse Hill Make money from it if you can; I don't mind. Elmwood, Wisconsin Do not send email advertisements to this address.
