Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > IMHO, the restrictions below do not prevent us distributing on CD, and > I believe that we already have docs in main with licenses as harsh as > this.
E.g. the GPL itself, as a document, is under copyright conditions that would definitely make it non DFSG-free had it happened to be a source code. > > 02. Any translation or derivative work of The Linux Net- > > work Administrators' Guide must be approved by the au- > > thor in writing before distribution. > This is awful. I don't think that clause has any legal significance compared to if it wasn't present. If distribution of derived work is not *explicitly* allowed, it is forbidden. Would you require that any documentation on the CDs should come with copyright statemtents that explicitly allowed modification? -- Henning Makholm http://www.diku.dk/students/makholm
