On Wed, 3 Mar 1999, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Wednesday 3 March 1999, at 13 h 51, the keyboard of Santiago Vila > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > #ifndef RMS > > > if we want Debian to succeed in that field, non-free is an essential > > > part of Debian > > > #endif > ... > > Personally, I don't care whether or not Debian succeeds in that "field". > > "field" was referring to biology.
Sorry, I thought you were referring to Debian succeeding in the field of non-free software in general. > If you don't care about non-free, you can [...] Why should *Debian* care about non-free at all? (We are talking about asking UW permission *in the name of Debian*, aren't we?). -- "48aeaeec2c54398066e96374bfcdfbff" (a truly random sig)
