"J.H.M. Dassen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Seen on /. :
> http://www.publicsource.apple.com/
>
> :Features Yet Another License, the Apple Public Source License
>
> http://www.publicsource.apple.com/apsl.html
As some of you already noted it is a non-free license.
But what strikes me more is that it allows copying, distribution, etc,
"solely for Your internal research and development," (2.1).
And they fail to define it. What do You think?
I wonder how they can claim this Open Source (and that without tm).
Tsts,
Jens
--
P.S.: Please vote against Spam! At
http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/
(Sorry Europeans only)
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key ID: 2048/E451C639 Jens Ritter
Key fingerprint: 5F 3D 43 1E 24 1E CC 48 1E 05 93 3A A7 10 73 37
