On Mon, 29 Mar 1999, Chip Salzenberg wrote: > > Must! I *must* notify apple by filling out the form. If I can't, > > for any of the reasons I suggested above, I cannot distribute the > > derived work. > > Not so: > > 13.5 Waiver; Construction. Failure by Apple to enforce any > provision of this License will not be deemed a waiver of future > enforcement of that or any other provision. > > If Apple fails to make the given web site available, then it is > failing to enforce the notification clause. That doesn't mean you > can't distribute, it just means that the notification clause is in > abeyance until Apple puts the site back up.
It's not. Failure to enforce would be not chasing me up if I made a violation. Failing to provide the web page is something else entirely. And there's nothing in that contract which obliges apple to do so. > > And Apple doesn't specify a time line for notification, either. I would say it does. It says that I 'may deploy covered code' *if* I 'notify Apple'..'by filling out'.. I interpret that as, until I fill out that form, I have no right to deploy the code. Note that this is *extremely* inconvienient, since every single trivial patch-bump on my code requires me to first notify apple. If I have a public-access CVS server, every single check-in... Jules /----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\ | Jelibean aka | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 6 Evelyn Rd | | Jules aka | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Richmond, Surrey | | Julian Bean | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TW9 2TF *UK* | +----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+ | War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left. | | When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy. | \----------------------------------------------------------------------/
