Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes, and probably will for a while. It took me two years to work > through the Xerox mechanisms to get the `derivative work' clause > added. I don't anticipate going back to that well soon. > > However, I don't see that this is a problem; silly, perhaps, but a > problem?
Well, I'm not on debian-legal for a reason :>, but I think this clause may keep it classified as non-free according to Debian. According to our guidelines, you can't put government-specific restrictions on software if you want us to consider it free. Restrictions like this put an undue burden on software development outside the named country. Someone on debian-legal feel free to correct me if I'm mistaken, but I suppose for now, I'm going to assume that ilu is going to continue to be non-free, and I'll see about making SWIG do what we need. Thanks -- Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
